Skip to content

Inessential Personnel: Insider Alleges Ineffective Interpreters Compromise Soldier Safety

October 18, 2010

Whistleblower Paul Funk has been involved with military support, interpreters, and linguists for over thirty years in war theaters in Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, and Afghanistan — so, when he says something is wrong with the interpreters currently being sent to Afghanistan, we ought to listen. Earlier this month, Funk filed an amended Complaint under the federal False Claims Act against Mission Essential Personnel, LLC for supplying unqualified interpreters and endangering the lives of American soldiers.

In response to a federal district judge’s order that Funk provide more specificity to his allegations, this most recent complaint names dozens of interpreters whom the company allegedly helped cheat on tests or alter test scores. Funk alleges that in addition to providing cheat sheets for language tests and altering scores, the company supplied “stand-ins” to take the tests to keep a steady supply of under-qualified interpreters going to Afghanistan in order to fulfill the $700 million no-bid cost-plus contract. According to the Complaint, Mission Essential Personnel used a variety of schemes to circumvent testing requirements:

“[F]or example, preparing records showing that individuals had passed their proficiency tests, when in fact they had submitted blank tests or otherwise failed; changing failing test scores to create records showing that tests had been passed.”

Additionally, the Complaint alleges that instructions were given to inflate the use of Mission Essential Personnel’s interpreters —  if an interpreter “entered two hours of work in time records, the records should be changed to reflect eight hours of work.” Funk’s amended Complaint alleges widespread dishonesty, fraud, and cover-up within the company:

U.S. ex rel. Paul Funk v. Mission Essential Personnel, LLC

Watch an ABC News report by Brian Ross on the Mission Essential Personnel allegations and the potential compromise of soldier safety caused by unqualified interpreters in the field.

To report defense contracting fraud or other False Claims Act violations, contact Frohsin & Barger.

2 Comments
  1. Aziz permalink

    Mission Essential Personnel is a fraud. Unfortunately I worked for this company for a year,MEP is staffed with theives. But our government keeps on pouring our tax payers Dollars into this company. The CEO of MEP stated that MEP is an American success story, so was Robert Murdoch, Emron, and Leahman Brothers. Go figure. We have a failed syatem here and no accountability. What is the difference between BEP and Mafia? One does it legal and in broad daylight, the other in the shadows.

  2. Aziz permalink

    Mission Essential Personnel is a fraud. Unfortunately I worked for this company for a year,MEP is staffed with theives. But our government keeps on pouring our tax payers Dollars into this company. The CEO of MEP stated that MEP is an American success story, so was Robert Murdoch, Emron, and Leahman Brothers. Go figure. We have a failed syatem here and no accountability. What is the difference between MEP and Mafia? One does it legal and in broad daylight, the other in the shadows.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: